IRR Calculator

Solve for the internal rate of return on one initial investment and an evenly spaced series of later cash flows, then compare it with a hurdle rate.

Solve the discount rate that sets NPV to zero Enter one upfront investment and an equally spaced series of later cash flows. The calculator estimates the periodic IRR, compares it with a hurdle rate, and shows when the cumulative cash may recover the original outlay.

Display currency

Switch the display currency used for the investment and cash-flow summaries without changing the IRR maths.

Assumptions

IRR assumes the listed cash flows are evenly spaced and occur at the end of each period. Non-standard cash-flow patterns can produce multiple valid IRRs or no conventional IRR at all.

Result

17.09%

Estimated annual IRR for the entered project cash-flow stream, solved as the discount rate that makes NPV equal zero.

NPV at hurdle
$16,986.54
Profitability index
1.17
Simple payback
2.875 years
Total net cash
$50,000.00
IRR is above the hurdle rate At these assumptions, the project clears the required return by 7.09% per year.

Interpretation note

Gross cash returned equals 1.5x the initial investment. Discounted payback at the hurdle rate is 3.447333 years.

Cash-flow sheet

PeriodCash flowCumulativeDiscounted at hurdleDiscounted cumulative
1$30,000.00-$70,000.00$27,272.73-$72,727.27
2$35,000.00-$35,000.00$28,925.62-$43,801.65
3$40,000.00$5,000.00$30,052.59-$13,749.06
4$45,000.00$50,000.00$30,735.61$16,986.54

Also in Valuation

Capital Budgeting

IRR calculator guide: solve the discount rate that sets project NPV to zero

An IRR calculator estimates the internal rate of return on a project by finding the discount rate that makes the net present value of the full cash-flow stream equal zero. It is a common capital-budgeting shortcut because it turns one initial outlay and a sequence of later cash flows into one percentage return, but that percentage should still be checked against a realistic hurdle rate and against NPV.

What IRR is actually measuring

Internal rate of return is the break-even discount rate for a project’s cash flows. If you discount the future cash inflows and outflows at exactly that rate, the present value of the full stream equals the initial investment and the project’s NPV becomes zero.

That framing matters because IRR is not just a growth rate on the initial outlay. It is a capital-budgeting rate implied by the timing and size of the full cash-flow pattern. A project with faster early inflows can have a higher IRR than a project with the same total cash received later, even if the total undiscounted cash returned is similar.

Core IRR maths

The IRR decision problem starts with an initial negative cash flow and then a series of later positive or mixed cash flows. The calculator solves for the rate that makes the present value of those later cash flows equal to the original outlay.

Because the rate appears inside the discounting formula for every period, IRR is usually found by iteration rather than by a simple one-line rearrangement. Spreadsheet software, calculators, and finance tools all solve it numerically.

NPV = CF_0 + CF_1 / (1 + r)^1 + CF_2 / (1 + r)^2 + ... + CF_n / (1 + r)^n

Standard net-present-value equation for a periodic cash-flow stream.

IRR solves for r when NPV = 0

The internal rate of return is the discount rate that makes the project break even on a present-value basis.

Why hurdle rate and NPV still matter

IRR is most useful when it is compared with a required return or hurdle rate. If IRR is above the hurdle, the project clears that return threshold. If it is below, the project does not meet the target return under the entered assumptions.

Even then, NPV remains important because it measures value created in currency terms rather than as a percentage. Two projects can both have acceptable IRRs while creating very different amounts of present-value surplus. That is why finance teams usually look at IRR and NPV together instead of treating IRR as a standalone decision rule.

Worked example: a project with one outlay and four annual inflows

Suppose a business invests 100,000 today and expects annual net cash inflows of 30,000, 35,000, 40,000, and 45,000 over the next four years. The calculator searches for the discount rate that brings the present value of those four inflows back to the original 100,000 cost.

If the solved IRR is above the company’s required return, the project clears the hurdle on an IRR basis. If the business instead evaluates the same cash flows at a 10% hurdle, the NPV output shows how much present-value surplus remains after discounting the inflows at that required rate.

When IRR can mislead

IRR works best on conventional projects with one upfront outlay followed by later inflows. If the cash-flow stream changes sign more than once, the project can have multiple mathematically valid IRRs or no single conventional IRR at all. In that situation, NPV at a realistic hurdle rate is usually the safer anchor.

IRR can also be misleading when projects differ a lot in scale or timing. A smaller project may show a higher IRR while creating less total value than a larger project with a lower IRR but a stronger NPV. That is why IRR should be treated as one decision aid, not a complete capital-allocation answer by itself.

Further reading

Frequently asked questions

What does it mean when IRR is above the hurdle rate?

It means the project’s implied return is higher than the minimum required return you entered. Under those assumptions, the project clears the return threshold. That does not automatically make it the best project available, because a different project could still create more value in absolute NPV terms.

Why can one project have more than one IRR?

When the cash-flow stream changes sign multiple times, the NPV equation can cross zero more than once. That creates multiple mathematically valid IRRs. In those cases, IRR is ambiguous and NPV at a realistic discount rate is usually more reliable for decision-making.

Is IRR the same as annual investment return?

Not exactly. IRR is the discount rate implied by the full project cash-flow schedule, not just a simple growth rate on the initial outlay. The timing of the cash flows matters materially, which is why projects with the same total cash returned can still have different IRRs.

Should IRR be used on its own?

Usually no. IRR is more useful when it is paired with NPV, payback, and practical operating assumptions. IRR alone can hide project scale, timing differences, and multiple-IRR problems in non-standard cash-flow streams.

Related

More from nearby categories

These related calculators come from the same leaf category, nearby sibling categories, or the same top-level topic.