Maximum Heart Rate Calculator

Estimate maximum heart rate from age and sex using Tanaka, Fox, Gulati, and Nes formulas, with five personalised training zones from recovery to max effort.

Share this calculator

Sex

184

Max HR (bpm)

Tanaka et al. 2001

Formula used

FormulaYearMax HR (bpm)
Tanaka2001184
Fox (Traditional)1971185
Gulati2010175
Nes2013189

Training zones

Zone 1 — Recovery

Active recovery, warm-up/cool-down

92–110 bpm

Zone 2 — Fat burn

Fat oxidation, aerobic base building

110–129 bpm

Zone 3 — Aerobic

Cardiovascular endurance, sustained effort

129–147 bpm

Zone 4 — Anaerobic

Speed and lactate threshold improvement

147–166 bpm

Zone 5 — Max effort

Maximum performance, VO₂ max intervals

166–184 bpm
Formula notes The traditional 220 − age formula (Fox 1971) is the most cited but less accurate. Tanaka (2001) is validated across a broad adult age range. Gulati (2010) is recommended for women. Actual maximum heart rate can vary by ±10–15 bpm from any formula estimate.

Also in Cardio & Conditioning

Fitness & Performance

Maximum Heart Rate Calculator

This calculator estimates your maximum heart rate (HR max) from your age and sex using four validated formulas, and generates personalised five-zone training zones based on the recommended result.

Why maximum heart rate matters

Maximum heart rate is the highest number of beats per minute your heart can achieve during all-out exercise. It is a key variable in setting training zones — the intensity ranges associated with different physiological adaptations, from fat-burning aerobic base work (Zone 2) to VO₂ max intervals (Zone 5).

HR max is primarily determined by age and genetics. Unlike resting heart rate or stroke volume, it responds very little to training. This means your training zones will change gradually as you age, even if your fitness improves.

Formula comparison

Fox (1971): 220 − age. The most widely cited formula, but studies show it can underestimate HR max in older adults and overestimate it in younger adults.

Tanaka (2001): 208 − 0.7 × age. Derived from a meta-analysis of 351 studies and over 18,000 subjects. Generally considered more accurate than the Fox formula across the adult lifespan.

Gulati (2010): 206 − 0.88 × age. Validated specifically in women during exercise stress testing. Recommended for females.

Nes (2013): 211 − 0.64 × age. Derived from the HUNT study in Norway; performs well for physically active individuals.

Training zones

The five zones are defined as percentages of HR max. Zone 1 (50–60%) is active recovery. Zone 2 (60–70%) is aerobic base and fat-burning. Zone 3 (70–80%) is sustained aerobic effort. Zone 4 (80–90%) is anaerobic threshold training. Zone 5 (90–100%) is maximum intensity for short intervals.

Zone 2 training has received particular attention in endurance sports — long, easy sessions below the aerobic threshold appear to drive substantial aerobic adaptations while minimising recovery cost.

Frequently asked questions

How far off can formula estimates be?

Population-based formulas have a standard deviation of roughly ±10–15 bpm. Your actual HR max could easily be 10–15 bpm higher or lower than any formula estimate. The best way to know your true HR max is a supervised maximal exercise test.

Does training change my maximum heart rate?

Training does not significantly increase HR max. Endurance training typically lowers resting heart rate and increases stroke volume (the amount of blood pumped per beat), raising cardiac output without raising HR max.

Should I always train in specific zones?

Zone-based training is a useful structure but not a rigid requirement. Many athletes use a polarised approach — most training in Zone 2 with some high-intensity work in Zone 4–5 — and see good results without obsessing over staying in precise zones.

Related

More from nearby categories

These related calculators come from the same leaf category, nearby sibling categories, or the same top-level topic.