Deficiency Risk Screener

Identify nutrients worth reviewing from life stage, diet pattern, and nutrition risk factors, with food-first guidance and testing prompts that avoid diagnosis language.

Share this calculator

Profile

Diet pattern

Result

Worth reviewing

Omnivore answers and life-stage details were screened for nutrient review signals only. This is a planning tool, not a diagnosis.

2 nutrient area(s) are worth reviewing. The pattern suggests a few practical nutrition weak points, but the screen does not diagnose deficiency. The score is 21/100 and highlights areas worth reviewing before assuming your current pattern is covering everything.
Review areas
2
High priority
0
Headline score
21/100

Vitamin D

Women 19 to 30 years / RDA target 15 mcg

Worth reviewing

24/100

Why it surfaced

  • Sun exposure is limited or inconsistent.
  • Vitamin D-fortified foods are not used most days.

Food-first ideas

Salmon, trout, and sardines / Fortified milk or plant drinks / Egg yolks and fortified cereals

ODS uses updated calcium and vitamin D DRIs: 15 mcg for ages 1 to 70, 20 mcg above 70.

Persistent low sun exposure, fracture risk, or clinician concern may justify vitamin D review rather than guessing from symptoms alone.

Iron

Women 19 to 30 years / RDA target 18 mg

Worth reviewing

18/100

Why it surfaced

  • Menstrual blood loss raises iron review priority.

Food-first ideas

Red meat and shellfish / Beans and lentils / Fortified cereals and pumpkin seeds

Iron requirements rise in adolescence, menstruating adults, and pregnancy, then fall again after menopause.

Heavy periods, pregnancy, fatigue, breathlessness, or GI symptoms are common reasons to discuss ferritin or iron-status testing.

Next steps

  • Review whether fortified dairy or plant alternatives, eggs, oily fish, calcium-set tofu, or a clinician-guided supplement plan are regular enough for your routine.
  • Check whether the weekly pattern includes reliable B12, iron, and folate anchors instead of assuming one good meal fixes the whole week.

Also in Micronutrients

Health — Nutrition

Deficiency risk screener guide: which nutrients are worth reviewing before symptoms or self-diagnosis

A deficiency risk screener is most useful when it highlights nutrients worth reviewing without pretending to diagnose a deficiency. This guide explains why life stage, diet pattern, medication use, and food-pattern habits can raise review priority, and why the right next step is often better food planning or clinician review rather than guessing from vague symptoms.

Why a risk screener is not a diagnosis tool

Micronutrient deficiency is not diagnosed from a checklist alone. Symptoms overlap, absorption varies, and some nutrient problems need blood tests or clinical history to interpret properly.

That is why this page is framed as a review screener. It helps you spot which nutrients deserve a closer look based on known intake-support factors rather than promising certainty from limited inputs.

Why life stage changes the review priority

Pregnancy, lactation, menstruation, and older age can shift nutrient priorities even when the overall diet pattern looks similar. Iron, folate, iodine, calcium, vitamin D, and vitamin B12 do not carry the same review weight in every life stage.

A trustworthy screener therefore starts with the matched reference profile and then looks for food-pattern or medication factors that make those targets harder to meet or interpret.

Why diet pattern and medication matter together

Food pattern alone is not the whole picture. A vegan pattern without B12 support is different from a vegan pattern with reliable fortified foods and supplementation, and a mixed diet can still run into vitamin B12, iron, or iodine problems if medication use or food variety is poor.

That is why this page combines dietary pattern with selected risk factors such as acid suppression, metformin, GI issues, restricted variety, and low iodized-salt use.

How to use the result well

Treat the flagged nutrients as a review queue. First check whether the food pattern truly contains reliable sources, then decide whether your situation needs a clinician or dietitian rather than more guesswork.

That approach keeps the tool practical. It helps you improve the food pattern and recognise when higher-stakes situations such as pregnancy, heavy menstrual bleeding, malabsorption, or persistent symptoms deserve professional follow-up.

Frequently asked questions

Does a high-priority result mean I am deficient?

No. It means the selected pattern contains risk factors that make that nutrient worth reviewing. Deficiency still depends on the broader clinical picture and sometimes lab testing.

Why can a mixed diet still flag vitamin B12 or iron?

Because medication use, food variety, menstruation, pregnancy, GI issues, or low use of common source foods can still make those nutrients worth checking even without a vegan pattern.

Why is iodine review included here?

Because iodine is easy to miss casually, especially when seafood, dairy, fortified alternatives, or iodized salt are not regular parts of the pattern. Pregnancy makes that question more important, not less.

When should I speak to a clinician instead of changing food choices first?

Pregnancy, lactation, heavy menstrual bleeding, malabsorption concerns, significant fatigue, neurological symptoms, or existing medical workups are all good reasons to move straight to clinician review.

Related

More from nearby categories

These related calculators come from the same leaf category, nearby sibling categories, or the same top-level topic.